Build a phase-gated EOL checklist sized to the sunset, with a named owner on every item. Use when the decision to retire is made and you need the operational plan.
Permissions
Files
Build a phase-gated EOL checklist sized to the sunset, with a named owner on every item. Use when the decision to retire is made and you need the operational plan.
Version history
Turn a sunset decision into a phase-gated operational plan: what must happen, in which lifecycle phase, and who owns it. The output is a working checklist — sticky-note-sized items, each with a verb and a named function — not a strategy document.
The checklist is sized to the sunset. A deprecated internal tool gets a dozen items across three phases. A regulated hardware line gets a cross-functional playbook across six phases with gate criteria between them. Both are correct; using the wrong one is the failure.
Works best with: The product being sunset and any dates you're already committed to.
Also useful: Customer and revenue scale, whether a replacement exists and how ready it is, contract or regulatory obligations, and whether hardware, inventory, or channel partners are in play.
Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or
an appended ARGUMENTS: line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it
covers; don't re-ask.
Arriving empty-handed? That works too. The skill asks up to three questions — what's being sunset and at what scale, whether there's a replacement, and what hard deadlines exist — then picks a level and builds. Unknowns become labeled assumptions rather than blockers.
Example invocations:
EOL checklist for our legacy reporting module, shutting down Dec 31, ~400 accounts.Build the heavy checklist for a hardware retirement — service contracts, 8 resellers, UL certified.Not all EOLs play out the same. Most land in the middle. Pick the level deliberately:
| Level 1 — Light | Level 2 — Standard | Level 3 — Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical scope | Feature, internal tool, unversioned API | Commercial product, active customers | Revenue-critical, hardware, regulated |
| Phases used | 2-3 (NSC, EOS, EOL) | 4-5 (NSC, EOS, EOE, EOM, EOL) | All 6 (NSC through EOSRV) |
| Functional areas | 4 | 11 | 15 |
| Gate criteria | Not needed | Between major phases | Between every phase, with approvers |
| Output feel | Punch list | Working checklist with owners and dates | Cross-functional playbook |
Level 2 is the default. Recommend a level, say why in one line, and let the user move it. If they go lighter, name the specific area that drops out so the choice is informed. Never default to Level 3 — a heavy checklist applied to a light sunset teaches teams that EOL process is ceremony, and they'll skip it next time when it matters.
The level is yours to change mid-build. "Actually make this heavier" is a normal thing to hear after the Legal row surfaces something.
Which of these become checklist phases: GA is a state, not a phase of work — nothing is checklisted there. EOR is contract-driven and only appears when renewals are in play. So working checklists usually span the six actionable phases: NSC, EOS, EOE, EOM, EOL, EOSRV, with EOR inserted when subscription or service contracts run past EOS.
Naming the gates you're not using is as useful as naming the ones you are. A Level 1 checklist should say "EOE and EOSRV don't apply — nothing to expand, nothing to service."
Filtered by level. The parenthetical marks the lowest level where each appears:
| Area | Level |
|---|---|
| Product and Strategy | 1 |
| Engineering and Technical | 1 |
| Support | 1 |
| Documentation and Training | 1 |
| Legal and Contractual | 2 |
| Financial Planning | 2 |
| Sales | 2 |
| Marketing | 2 |
| Customer Success | 2 |
| IT Systems | 2 |
| Data Management | 2 |
| Inventory and Supply Chain | 3 |
| Channel and Partner Management | 3 |
| Regulatory and Compliance | 3 |
| Internal Organizational Alignment | 3 |
Every item is 4 to 8 words, names a verb, and carries a named owner (a function, not a person's calendar). "Legal reviews contracts" is an item. "Ensure appropriate review of all relevant contractual obligations across the customer base" is a paragraph wearing a checkbox.
Why the owner is mandatory: an unowned item is a wish. Forcing a function onto every line surfaces cross-functional gaps early — when you can't name who owns "notify channel partners," you have just discovered that nobody does.
A phase gate is what must be true before you advance, with an approver. "EOS to EOE: last-time-buy orders closed — Approver: Sales VP." This is what stops an EOL from being one announcement followed six months later by somebody quietly pulling a plug.
Recommend from blast radius — customers, revenue, contracts, hardware, partners — then present all three and let the user choose. If the level is genuinely unclear, ask:
"How complex is this sunset?
Most sunsets are Standard. Which sounds like yours?"
Map the level to phases, then check for the two overrides:
If a date is genuinely unknown, write TBD — and if a date shouldn't be set yet (no migration
path exists), write Not scheduled and add an item naming the precondition. An invented EOL date
is a promise you will break in public.
For each phase in scope, walk the functional areas warranted by the level. Each item:
Cover, at minimum, the four things sunsets most often strand:
For each phase transition, list what must be true and who signs. Three to five criteria per gate is plenty. If you can't name an approver, the gate isn't real.
Always include a short post-EOL block — archival, final report, and a lessons-learned review. The review is the item teams cut first and regret most; the next sunset is always easier when someone wrote down what surprised you in this one.
Close with assumptions to validate — every unknown from Step 1, stated plainly.
"Where next?
eol-messageReply with a number, a combination ('1 & 3'), or your own path."
examples/sample.md — Fieldlight Classic Dispatch (SaaS, Level 2, five phases)examples/sample-industrial.md — NFA-200 controller line (industrial, Level 3, six phases with
a deliberately undated EOL)Symptom: Every sunset gets the 15-area, six-phase playbook because it's "more thorough."
Consequence: Teams learn EOL process is theater, skip it entirely on the next one — and the next one is the one with the contracts.
Fix: Right-size deliberately. A Level 1 checklist that gets used beats a Level 3 that gets ignored.
Symptom: "Ensure customer data is exported." Owner: blank, or "the team."
Consequence: Everyone assumes someone else has it. On shutdown day, nobody did.
Fix: Every item names a function. If you can't name one, that's the finding — escalate it rather than papering over it.
Symptom: An EOL date gets written down because the checklist template had a blank for it.
Consequence: You announce a date, discover the migration path doesn't exist, and move it. Customers who planned around the first date stop believing the second.
Fix: Not scheduled is a legitimate entry. Pair it with the precondition that would let you
schedule it.
Symptom: Everything lands in one phase called "EOL."
Consequence: You stop sales, stop support, and shut down on the same day. Customers experience it as an outage with advance notice.
Fix: Separate the gates. Stopping sales is cheap and early; stopping service is expensive and last.
Symptom: The checklist covers the product and its customers, but not the four internal systems that quietly query its API.
Consequence: The product retires on schedule and three dashboards, a billing job, and a partner integration break the next morning.
Fix: The IT Systems and Data Management areas exist for this. At Level 1, still ask once: what reads from this?
These stand on their own — none is a prerequisite for this skill, and this skill isn't a prerequisite for them. If you already picked a level elsewhere, just say "Level 2" and this skill will build to it; there's no handoff artifact to carry.
eol-readiness-advisor — if the decision itself still needs
a case, or you want the level recommended for youeol-stakeholder-sequence — who to talk to and wheneol-internal-enablement — readying customer-facing teamseol-message — the customer-facing announcementprompts/eol-checklist.md in the
https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-prompts repo.In these kits
More from @deanpeters
Works with
Claude, Codex, Cursor & more